Maxim Defense is proud to announce a major legal victory in the Mock v. Garland lawsuit challenging the Biden Administration’s “pistol brace” ban rule issued by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). Yesterday, United States District Court Judge Reed O’Connor granted summary judgment in favor of Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and its co-plaintiffs, including Maxim Defense, and issued a final judgment and order vacating the ATF’s rule. The case and opinion can be found at FPCLegal.org.<http://fpclegal.org/>
“This victory is not only a testament to the diligence and expertise of our legal team but also a reaffirmation of the principles of justice and accountability in administrative law,” remarked Dave Dahl, COO of Maxim Defense. “We commend the Court for its thorough consideration of the case and its commitment to upholding the rule of law.”
FPC President Brandon Combs added, “Today’s order shows that our community can take on an immoral government and win. FPC members should be proud of what was accomplished today. We look forward to defending this victory on appeal and up to the Supreme Court, just as we have in other cases.”
This week’s victory is one in a series of successes for the FPC community against the Biden Administration. The United States Supreme Court recently agreed to hear one of FPC’s cases in which it prevailed in the courts below.
The Mock v. Garland case, which challenged the validity of the Final Rule, has been a focal point of legal scrutiny and deliberation. With this judgment, the Court has unequivocally affirmed the merits of our position, underscoring the importance of adherence to procedural fairness and substantive rationale in regulatory actions.
The plaintiffs in this case are represented by attorneys Cody Wisniewski of FPC Action Foundation, Bradley Benbrook and Stephen Duvernay of the Benbrook Law Group, and R. Brent Cooper and Benjamin Passey of Cooper & Scully. Plaintiffs in this case include two individual FPC members, Maxim Defense, and FPC. FPC Action Foundation represented the Plaintiffs, alongside Benbrook Law. We expect the Mock decision and remedy to be appealed by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).
The implications of this ruling extend beyond the immediate parties involved, signaling a pivotal moment in the realm of administrative law. By holding regulatory actions to rigorous standards of procedural integrity and substantive justification, the Court has safeguarded the rights and interests of all stakeholders affected by governmental decision-making.
Maxim Defense remains steadfast in its dedication to promoting transparency, fairness, and the rule of law. This victory underscores our unwavering commitment to advocating for responsible governance and protecting the rights of those we serve.
About Maxim Defense: Maxim Defense is a leading provider of firearm solutions, specializing in innovative designs and high-quality manufacturing. Our mission is to deliver superior performance and reliability to law enforcement, military, and civilian customers. For more information, visit www.maximdefense.com.
